Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Spinning
37.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 SS DH HG
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R, offering significantly better performance in weight (175g / 6,17oz) and total score (8.36 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R?
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX
