Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.36 out of 10) and durability (5.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Shimano Complex XR 2500X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X
