Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.76 out of 10) and durability (5.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
