Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X edges out Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.76 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05 lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X
