Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X edges out Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.76 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Delphin REDIX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
