Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX

Shimano Complex XR

Spinning

77.60 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.48 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight155g / 5.47oz

Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €215.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

90.10 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000-CXH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX edges out Shimano Complex XR C2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). Still, Shimano Complex XR C2000X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.5 out of 10 and a weight of 155g / 5,47oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX

8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency