Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

Shimano Complex XR

Spinning

77.60 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.48 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight155g / 5.47oz

Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €215.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

82.70 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.62 out of 10

Ergonomics6.32 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight205g / 7.23oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Complex XR C2000X and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Complex XR C2000X offers a durability of 5.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX

6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency