Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.76 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
