Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Shimano Complex XR C2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs). Still, Shimano Complex XR C2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a ergonomics of 6.48 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Delphin INKS 4000X
