Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Shimano Complex XR C2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs). Still, Shimano Complex XR C2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a ergonomics of 6.48 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF
Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX