Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD edges out Shimano Complex XR C2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs). Still, Shimano Complex XR C2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a ergonomics of 6.48 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
