Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR, C2000, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 21CMXXRC2000F4
Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €215.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC2000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100
Daiwa 24 TDR QD, 3012QD-DH, Match & Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10516-313
Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €229.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3012QD-DH
  • Handle typeDouble handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano Complex XR C2000X and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Complex XR C2000X offers a weight of 155g / 5,47oz, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX

  • This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios