Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X

Shimano Complex XR

Spinning

77.60 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.48 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight155g / 5.47oz

Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €215.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Penn FIERCE IV

Spinning

68.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.07 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs

Weight280g / 9.88oz

Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €65.70
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Conclusion

Both Shimano Complex XR C2000X and Penn FIERCE IV 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Complex XR C2000X offers a total score of 7.76 out of 10, while Penn FIERCE IV 2500X stands out for a ball bearings of 4+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn FIERCE IV?

Penn FIERCE IV 2500X

7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.