Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX
