Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX
