Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and maximum drag (3kg / 6,61lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
