Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano Complex XR C2000X and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Complex XR C2000X offers a weight of 155g / 5,47oz, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
