Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
46.10 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €60.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000FJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.76 out of 10) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Delphin HORNET 40X
