Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX edges out Shimano Complex XR C2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch). Still, Shimano Complex XR C2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Shimano Tiagra?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.2 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (6), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
