Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
86.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight2445g / 86.25oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50WLRSA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Shimano Complex XR C2000X and Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Complex XR C2000X offers a weight of 155g / 5,47oz, while Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX stands out for a maximum drag of 18kg / 39,68lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Shimano Tiagra?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX
- Scoring 8.87 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX
