Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Shimano Complex XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.15/100

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Complex XR C2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (155g / 5,47oz) and total score (7.76 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Complex XR C2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Complex XR and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano Complex XR C2000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.97 out of 10 (155g / 5,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX
