Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (138g / 4,87oz) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 68 centimeter / 26.77 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.08 out of 10 (138g / 4,87oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
