Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and total score (7.38 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.77 out of 10 (185g / 6,53oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
