Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and total score (7.38 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X
