Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and total score (7.38 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX
