Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and total score (7.38 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX
