Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and durability (5.73 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin YUPIE


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Delphin YUPIE
