Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
Spinning
45.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/180
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 clearly outshines Cormoran Sportline 2PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and durability (5.73 out of 10). While Cormoran Sportline 2PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Cormoran Sportline 2PiF?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Cormoran Sportline 2PiF
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
