Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a serious drag score of 9.2 out of 10 (15kg / 33,07lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
