Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €209.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
