Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.73 out of 10) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a weight of 260g / 9,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.51 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
