Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX stands out for a weight of 255g / 8,99oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
