Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and weight (265g / 9,35oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.49 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
