Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and weight (305g / 10,76oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.26 out of 10 (305g / 10,76oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
