Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
