Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) and the ball bearings (4). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX
Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX
Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX
Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Beastmaster
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX