Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT
Spinning
55.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the durability (5.73 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 180g / 6,35oz and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 20 Exceler LT?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
