Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX stands out for a weight of 290g / 10,23oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
