Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
75.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €198.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
