Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a line retrieve per crank of 68 centimeter / 26.77 inch, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
