Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the weight (195g / 6,88oz). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
