Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX stands out for a weight of 195g / 6,88oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
