Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
