Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX
