Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a weight of 170g / 6oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X
