Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX
