Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (195g / 6,88oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX
