Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (195g / 6,88oz) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 68 centimeter / 26.77 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa BG 4000X
