Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X
