Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (150g / 5,29oz) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 68 centimeter / 26.77 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
- With a retrieve score of 5.43 out of 10 (68 centimeter / 26.77 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Beastmaster


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX
