Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000

Multireels

73.80 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.73 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio3.2:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight1230g / 43.39oz

Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch

Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €622.90
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €673.66
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in weight (175g / 6,17oz) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX

The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.