Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 offers a durability of 5.73 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
